Defending freedom of association for Trinity Western in Ont., granted intervener status in BC, seeks to intervene again in Nova Scotia appeal

Share this:

Defending freedom of association for Trinity Western in Ont., granted intervener status in BC, seeks to intervene again in Nova Scotia appeal

Share this:

Trinity Western University, Langley, BC

The Justice Centre has been granted intervener status in three different court actions which will impact the freedom of all Canadians to create, join and maintain the voluntary associations of their own choosing.

On Tuesday, June 2, the Justice Centre presented oral argument in defence of freedom of association in Toronto, in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of Upper Canada.  Toronto lawyer and Justice Centre Board member Daniel Santoro argued before a three-judge panel of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.

The law societies of B.C., Ontario and Nova Scotia have ruled against recognizing the law school of Trinity Western University (TWU), a private Evangelical Christian university in Langley, B.C.

The Federation of Law Societies of Canada has approved the law program of TWU as meeting academic and professional standards.  The three law societies admit there is nothing wrong with TWU’s law program, but claim that TWU’s Community Covenant discriminates against the LGBTQ+ community.  The Community Covenant prohibits numerous legal activities such as vulgar or obscene language, drunkenness, viewing pornography, gossip, and sexual activity outside of the marriage of one man and one woman.  TWU’s expectations discriminate against the majority of Canadians, for a myriad of reasons, all of which boil down to an unwillingness to practice an Evangelical Christian lifestyle.

On May 14, 2015, the Supreme Court of British Columbia granted the Justice Centre leave to intervene in Trinity Western University v. Law Society of British Columbia, scheduled for August 25, 2015.

The Justice Centre also intervened at the Nova Scotia Supreme Court, in Trinity Western University v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society.

In January 2015, that Court ruled in favour of freedom of association and religion.  This ruling is being appealed by the Barristers Society, and the Justice Centre has applied to intervene before the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal to once again defend freedom of association for all Canadians.                        

In all three court actions, the Justice Centre argues for the Charter section 2(d) right to freedom of association, including the right of every charity, temple, church, ethnic and cultural association, sports club, and political group to establish its own rules and membership requirements.

Speaking to media, Justice Centre president John Carpay stated: “A court ruling against TWU’s freedom of association would undermine the freedom of association of every other group in Canada as well.”


Read Court Documents

Share this:

Judge rules that “being upset or offended is not the same as discrimination”

HALIFAX, NS: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is pleased to announce that the Nova Scotia Supreme Court has...

Chris Barber asks Court to stay proceedings against him

OTTAWA, ON: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that Chris Barber has asked the Ontario Court of Justice...

Nurse Amy Hamm appeals unprofessional conduct verdict to BC Supreme Court

VANCOUVER, BC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that nurse Amy Hamm is appealing the decision of the...

Explore Related News

Halifax, Nova Scotia - Sept. 12, 2024: Sign for The Law Courts, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and Supreme Court
Read More
Convoy Trial 20250403
Read More
695f13be-a7eb-887f-aad9-bbeb899da9a9
Read More
Halifax, Nova Scotia - Sept. 12, 2024: Sign for The Law Courts, Nova Scotia Court of Appeal and Supreme Court
Convoy Trial 20250403
695f13be-a7eb-887f-aad9-bbeb899da9a9
36ed0f66-c3c2-25ab-f4e3-46d513620b14