Justice Centre urges Committee to pass Bill S-217 (detention in custody) to ensure that judges can protect the public

Share this:

Justice Centre urges Committee to pass Bill S-217 (detention in custody) to ensure that judges can protect the public

Share this:

OTTAWA: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) will appear before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights this Tuesday, April 11, to present its recommendations regarding Bill S-217, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody).

The Justice Centre’s Litigation Director, Jay Cameron, will appear before the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights between 3:30 P.M. and 5:30 P.M. in Centre Block, Room 237-C.

Other witnesses include Cheryl Webster, Associate Professor, University of Ottawa, Anthony N. Doob, Professor, University of Toronto and Nancy Irving, Barrister and Solicitor.

Bill S-217 (“Wynn’s law”) was tabled before the Senate in February 2016 by Senator Bob Runciman in response to the slaying of RCMP Constable David Wynn by career criminal Shawn Rehn, who was out on bail at the time at the time of the killing on January 17, 2015.  This Act amends the Criminal Code so as to require that the criminal record of the accused, if one exists, be put before the judge who is considering the bail hearing.

The Justice Centre will recommend to the Committee that Bill S-217 be enacted, to better ensure the rights and freedoms of Canadians are guaranteed by the judicial process. The Justice Centre’s Brief to Parliament concludes:

The amendment to section 518(1)(c) as proposed in Bill S-217 prevents human prosecutorial error by requiring that the physical paper record of an accused is presented at a bail hearing 100% of the time. The introduction of the accused’s record at a bail hearing is universally in the best interests of the Canadian public and the judiciary. The mandatory introduction of the record is also required to protect the Charter rights of accused persons themselves, both so that they may be aware of the case against them and any errors in the alleged record, as well as so they may have the benefit of the record before an impartial judge.

Share this:

Trudeau’s prorogation served only the interests of the Liberal Party

There can be little doubt that the recent prorogation of Parliament until March 24, announced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau...

Lawyers claim Trudeau’s prorogation of Parliament ‘illegal’

Many Canadians are understandably rejoicing over a very unpopular prime minister having announced he is leaving office in March 2025....

Canadians challenge Prime Minister’s decision to prorogue Parliament: “no reasonable justification”

TORONTO: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is providing lawyers on an urgent...

Explore Related News

CP173795895
Read More
6ee99d24-d440-e278-9c7f-c54656cb0130
Read More
Quebec Premier François Legault (Photo credit: Sylvain Roy Roussel)
Read More
CP173795895
6ee99d24-d440-e278-9c7f-c54656cb0130
Quebec Premier François Legault (Photo credit: Sylvain Roy Roussel)
Osgoode Hall in Toronto Canada