It’s Now Obvious That Omicron Was Another Variant of Fearmongering

Share this:

It’s Now Obvious That Omicron Was Another Variant of Fearmongering

Share this:

 

Omicron was first identified in South Africa on November 24, 2021, by Dr. Angelique Coetzee, a private physician and chairwoman of the South African Medical Association. Dr. Coetzee told the BBC that while more time was needed to know how serious the virus might be for vulnerable people, the patients she had examined showed “extremely mild symptoms” only. Dr. Coetzee stated that most complained of fatigue and body aches; none had required hospital admittance.  South Africa’s hospitals were not overrun with Omicron patients, in a country where three quarters of the people are not double-jabbed.

South Africa was not the only jurisdiction where Omicron’s symptoms proved to be extremely mild. Canada’s Chief Public Health Officer, Dr. Theresa Tam, stated in mid-December that all of the Omicron cases were either mild or asymptomatic, and by early January, she admitted that “severe illness” was not spiking in proportion to the Omicron case count.

In spite of Omicron’s mildness, and in spite of Canada’s 87% vaccination rate (with an ostensibly “effective” Covid shot), Prime Minister Trudeau called for Canadians to “hunker down” for a “difficult winter” amid the expected surge in cases and deaths from Omicron. He called the spike in infections “scary,” and went on to make it mandatory for 100% of truckers (working in one of the most solitary occupations) to get the Covid shots. With this terrifying new threat running rampant, Federal Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos issued stern warnings to avoid travel just before the holiday season.

Ontario Premier Doug Ford declared on December 10, 2021, that “we’ve never faced an enemy like Omicron” – even though on that date, Canada-wide Omicron cases were still only 87 in number, and nobody had died of it or with it. Mr. Ford limited indoor private gatherings to just 10 people. Quebec Premier Francois Legault also went even further, declaring a state of emergency and re-imposing the strict 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. curfew. Vaccine-free Quebecers were banned from shopping at big-box retail stores, and Premier Legault announced plans to introduce a special new tax on those who had not taken the Covid shots. Catholic bishops cancelled Christmas church services. While Quebec officials claimed the decision to reinstate the curfew in December was based on evidence gathered by various organizations, including Quebec’s public health institute, that institute denies that it provided any documents justifying the need for a curfew.

Predictably, government-funded media also promoted the fear of Omicron. On December 10, 2021, the Toronto Star announced that “Covid’s worst is coming,” parroting the World Health Organization warning that Omicron posed a “very high” global risk.

We should all be relieved of course, that the Omicron Covid variant has not lived up to the overheated predictions that accompanied its arrival in Canada in November of 2021. This gap between fearmongering and reality was consistent with the gargantuan gap between the initial March 2020 predictions about Covid being as bad as the Spanish Flu of 1918 and the reality that has ensued in the past two years. Covid’s impact on the world’s population life expectancy has been a tiny fraction of the impact of the 1918 Spanish Flu, which killed tens of millions of younger people in their 20s, 30s and 40s.

With Omicron, politicians once again promoted the worst of any Covid-related development and rushed to impose further restrictions on business and society. Canadians whose jobs, travel plans, Charter rights and indeed their whole lives were impacted by government action may reasonably ask: “Were the various government responses proportionate to what was known of the Omicron threat?”

The message of fear proclaimed by government officials and the media was far overblown in light of the actual evidence concerning this “variant of concern.” Harsher lockdowns and mandates were imposed throughout Canada without justification, and Charter-protected rights and freedoms were further infringed with no demonstrable evidence. Indeed, Omicron-discoverer Dr. Coetzee felt strongly that people outside South Africa were over-reacting.

Regarding Omicron, South Africa got over it, most American states were indifferent, and Canada chose to lock down.  Whatever the inconveniences imposed on Canadians by capricious and arbitrary government action, was there any advantage to this Canadian approach?

Canada’s response to Omicron, including Ottawa’s insistence that all truckers get the Covid shot, and the continuing unscientific discrimination that prevents the vaccine-free from flying on airplanes, show that our governments are informed by some “science” which does not exist outside of Canada.

How many more times must Canadians be expected to credit their elected officials with wisdom and goodwill in the face of blatant fearmongering?  The past three months have been much ado about not so much. Public health has been politicized for ends that have nothing much to do with public health, and Canadians are paying a high price for it.

John Carpay, The Epoch Times

Share this:

Getting it right, on Alberta rights

When the Government of Alberta last month introduced its amendments to the Alberta Bill of Rights, the Justice Centre for...

Bait and switch on parental rights and religious freedom?

A response to Alberta's Bill 27... it needs three important fixes if it is to give parents the security they...

Quebec municipality challenged for violating freedom of religion

WATERLOO, QC: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms announces that a constitutional challenge...

Explore Related News

Photo Credit: Claude Laprise
Read More
Alberta Legislature
Read More
Photo credit: Christopher Odonnell
Read More
Photo Credit: Claude Laprise
Alberta Legislature
Photo credit: Christopher Odonnell
sep-19-MC