RELEASE: City of Yorkton, SK challenged to stop censoring “Right for Life” week

Share this:

Justice Centre for Constituional Freedoms

RELEASE: City of Yorkton, SK challenged to stop censoring “Right for Life” week

Share this:

YORKTON, SK: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) has made a formal request for the City of Yorkton to reverse its rejection of Parkland Right for Life’s application to have a “Right for Life” week.

On September 5, 2017, the President of Parkland Right for Life, Ted Deneschuk requested to appear before Yorkton City Council and provide oral submissions in support of an application to have the City proclaim the week of October 1-7, 2017 as “Right for Life” week.

On September 6, 2017, City officials informed Mr. Deneschuk that the City had decided to deny his request. In a letter sent to Mr. Deneschuk on September 6, the City stated that his request was denied because a “Right for Life” week proclamation would contravene section 3.B.ii of the City’s Proclamation Policy. The Policy states that proclamations will not be issued for “[matters] of political controversy, ideological, or religious beliefs or individual, [sic] conviction”.

Notwithstanding the Proclamation Policy, the City has made a practice of issuing proclamations for subject which could be viewed as controversial, ideological and religious subjects.  For example, the week of March 26-April 1, 2017 was proclaimed by the City as “Gender Diversity Week” and May 13, 2017 was proclaimed as “Falun Dafa Day”.

The Justice Centre’s letter explains that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms requires the City to neither “favour nor hinder any particular belief, and the same holds true for non-belief”: Mouvement laïque québécois v Saguenay (City), 2015 SCC 16, at para. 72. By mislabeling the proposed “Right for Life” week, and its associated pro-life viewpoint, as a “matter of political controversy, ideological, or religious beliefs or individual conviction”, but issuing proclamations regarding the belief in alternative genders (which remains deeply controversial in Canada) and Buddhist spiritual meditation, the City has violated its duty of neutrality, acted in a biased and arbitrary fashion, and engaged in the very favouritism  prohibited by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The Justice Centre’s letter, which was sent to the City on Tuesday, October 10, states that, “[the] City of Yorkton’s discrimination against pro-life views and Mr. Deneschuk is unlawful.”  The letter requests that the City reverse its arbitrary and biased decision to deny Mr. Deneschuk’s application, and grant the application to proclaim a “Right for Life” week on the first available week.

Share this:

Trudeau’s prorogation served only the interests of the Liberal Party

There can be little doubt that the recent prorogation of Parliament until March 24, announced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau...

Lawyers claim Trudeau’s prorogation of Parliament ‘illegal’

Many Canadians are understandably rejoicing over a very unpopular prime minister having announced he is leaving office in March 2025....

Canadians challenge Prime Minister’s decision to prorogue Parliament: “no reasonable justification”

TORONTO: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is providing lawyers on an urgent...

Explore Related News

CP173795895
Read More
6ee99d24-d440-e278-9c7f-c54656cb0130
Read More
Quebec Premier François Legault (Photo credit: Sylvain Roy Roussel)
Read More
CP173795895
6ee99d24-d440-e278-9c7f-c54656cb0130
Quebec Premier François Legault (Photo credit: Sylvain Roy Roussel)
Osgoode Hall in Toronto Canada